We had fun didn’t we

I have recently returned from a short residential trip with one of our classes, having been asked to help out due to the complicated nature of a couple of the pupils, one involving challenging behaviour and the other medical needs. We have a policy that unless the family doesn’t want their child to go, then every child gets the opportunity no matter what their level of need is. In order to make this a safe experience for all, the trips are very carefully risk assessed and where necessary a member of SLT accompanies the group to provide the class teacher with support.

On this trip I had one very specific role and that as to make sure that during a trip to a water park I was no more than arms length from one pupil who is prone to quite severe epilepsy and is particularly sensitive to changes in temperature. The emergency plan to ensure that he got access to this opportunity included an additional member of staff poolside carrying the emergency medication, towels, dressing gown, a full change of clothes for me as well as my wallet and phone, notification of the on site life guards and the wearing of a fairly discrete yellow wristband, (their requirement not ours). This would mean that in the event of a seizure occurring in the pool I would be able to summon assistance whilst a colleague prepared a safe, soft flooring space and got the emergency medication ready in case it was needed. I’d then have clothing and money / phone in order to go straight to the hospital without having to go and get properly changed in the event that emergency medication had to be administered. The child’s parents were staying somewhere close by in case they were needed to meet us at the hospital.

The reason we do this is that in Special Schools, as with Mainstream, our responsibilities extend beyond education, in the sense of enabling children to acquire new skills and knowledge, to include the sharing of experiences. For a small number of our pupils, if we don’t ensure that they get these opportunities then it is quite likely that they won’t get them at all, due to the complexity of their needs. In this particular case the partnership between school and home ensured that the child could participate and that the family would be on hand should the need arise, for them to reassure their child and reassure themselves, although their availability wasn’t a requirement.

In this instance we spent the day moving from one section of the park to the next, ensuring line of sight with my colleague on the side and joining in with all the fun being had by others in the group. This mainly involved me being dunked, made to stand under torrents of falling water whilst being laughed at and going up and down slides. It is a fine balance between ensuring safety and ensuring enjoyment and can be quite demanding over long periods of time, continually making and remaking dynamic risk assessments.

The day passed off without a hitch and thankfully none of the plans we had put in place needed to be used. The next morning at breakfast the child came up to me and said, “Simon, we had fun didn’t we.”. Yes we did!

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “We had fun didn’t we

  1. Pingback: The things we do to be more inclusive | SENtinel

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s